Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTalukder, M. A. H.
dc.contributor.authorRahman, MM
dc.contributor.authorHossain, M. M.
dc.contributor.authorMian, M. A. C.
dc.contributor.authorKhatiq, Ml Q A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T06:17:05Z
dc.date.available2021-11-25T06:17:05Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.bsmrau.edu.bd/handle/123456789/1330
dc.description.abstractAbstract : A trial was carried out to select suitable rootstock and appropriate grafting method for mandarin at the Nursery of Pomology Division, Horticulture Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur. Scions of BARI iComaia-d were grafted on four rootstocks (Cleopetva mandarin. Rough lemon. Calaroofwi and Rangpur lime) with three grafting methods (deft, veneer and side grafting).The studies revealed that higher percentage of grafting success was recorded in cleft and veneer method (92.40% and 89.3%, respectively) on Rangpur lime which was at par with cleft and veneer method on Rough lemon (90 JO and 83.2%*. respecti vely ) and cleft method on cleopetra mandarin (85.6). Cleft followed by veneer method .showed higher survivability when grafted on Rangpur lime (89.80% md 8&29%* respectively) a* well SMM» Rough lemon (87.40% and 85.10%, respectively) ac 180 daysafter grafting. Conclusively, cleft and veneer method showed higher perreac off'graft ttuxssfc length of.gnftt ind percent of survivability on Rough lemon foitowed hy Stiugpiir iime.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBSMRAUen_US
dc.publisherBSMRAUen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol-2;
dc.subjectRootstocken_US
dc.subjectgrafting methodsen_US
dc.subjectga& iuircemen_US
dc.subjectcrfeuinsnfc rmau&im rough lemonen_US
dc.subjectcalamonsien_US
dc.subjectRangpur limeen_US
dc.titleEffect of rootstock and grafting methods on the graft success in mandarinen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record